23. (1) A trustee desiring to pass the accounts of dealings with the trust estate may file the accounts in the office of the Superior Court of Justice, and the proceedings and practice upon the passing of such accounts shall be the same and have the like effect as the passing of executors’ or administrators’ accounts in the court. R.S.O. 1990, c. T.23, s. 23 (1); 2000, c. 26, Sched. A, s. 15 (2).
48. Every executor who is also a trustee under the will may be required to account for their trusteeship in the same manner as they may be required to account in respect of their executorship. R.S.O. 1990, c. E.21, s. 48.
As to the extent of the issues which may be raised on a passing of accounts, whether by an estate trustee, or guardian, the powers of the court are set out at Section 49 of the Estates Act as follows:
49. (1) A guardian appointed by the Superior Court of Justice may pass the accounts of the guardian’s dealings with the estate before the judge of the court by which letters of guardianship were issued. R.S.O. 1990, c. E.21, s. 49 (1); 2006, c. 19, Sched. C, s. 1 (1).
(3) The judge, on passing any accounts under this section, has power to inquire into any complaint or claim by any person interested in the taking of the accounts of misconduct, neglect, or default on the part of the executor, administrator or trustee occasioning financial loss to the estate or trust fund, and the judge, on proof of such claim, may order the executor, administrator or trustee, to pay such sum by way of damages or otherwise as the judge considers proper and just to the estate or trust fund, but any order made under this subsection is subject to appeal. R.S.O. 1990, c. E.21, s. 49 (3).
(4) The judge may order the trial of an issue of any complaint
or claim under subsection (3), and in such case the judge shall make all necessary
directions as to pleadings, production of documents, discovery and otherwise
in connection with the issue. R.S.O. 1990, c. E.21, s. 49 (4).
(5)-(7) Repealed: 1997, c. 23, s. 8 (2).
(8) Where by the terms of a will or other instrument in writing under which such an executor, administrator or trustee acts, real or personal property or any right or interest therein, or proceeds therefrom have heretofore been given, or are hereafter to be vested in any person, executor, administrator or trustee for any religious, educational, charitable or other purpose, or are to be applied by them to or for any such purpose, notice of taking the accounts shall be served upon the Public Trustee. R.S.O. 1990, c. E.21, s. 49 (8).
(9) Where a person has died intestate in Ontario and administration has been granted to some person, not one of the next of kin, and it appears to be doubtful whether the intestate left any next of kin surviving them or that there are no known next of kin resident in Ontario, notice of taking the accounts shall be served upon the Public Trustee. R.S.O. 1990, c. E.21, s. 49 (9).
(10) Where accounts submitted to the judge of the Superior Court of Justice are of an intricate or complicated character and in the judge’s opinion require expert investigation, the judge may appoint an accountant or other skilled person to investigate and to assist him or her in auditing the accounts. R.S.O. 1990, c. E.21, s. 49 (10); 2006, c. 19, Sched. C, s. 1 (1).
As to the jurisdiction of the attorney and guardian to pass accounts, such jurisdiction arises from the Substitute Decisions Act S.O 1992. c. 30, at Section 42(1)-(5) as follows:
42. (1) The court may, on application, order that all or a specified part of the accounts of an attorney or guardian of property be passed. 1992, c. 30, s. 42 (1).
(2) An attorney, the grantor or any of the persons listed in subsection (4) may apply to pass the attorney’s accounts. 1992, c. 30, s. 42 (2).
(3) A guardian of property, the incapable person or any of the persons listed in subsection (4) may apply to pass the accounts of the guardian of property. 1992, c. 30, s. 42 (3).
(4) The following persons may also apply:
Request for increased Costs
(11) Where the estate trustee or a person with a financial interest in the
estate seeks costs greater than the amount allowed in Tariff C, the estate
trustee or other person shall serve a request for increased costs (Form
74.49.2 or 74.49.3) on every other party to the application and file it,
with proof of service.
(11.1) Unless the court orders otherwise, a request for increased costs
may be served and filed only during the following period:
1. in the case of an estate trustee, the period beginning 10 days after
service of the notice of application is complete and ending 10 days before
the hearing date specified in the notice.
2. In the case of a person with a financial interest in the estate, the
period beginning 10 days after the notice of application is served on the
person and ending 10 days before the hearing date specified in the notice.”
As to how the passing of accounts may come about, Rule 74.15(1)(h) gives
any individual having a financial interest in an estate to compel a passing
of accounts.
The forms applicable to passing of accounts matter whether contested or
uncontested are set out in the Rules and Forms at 74.44 through 74.51.
Other applicable Rules include Rule 38.10(1)(a) which gives the court the
jurisdiction to grant the relief sought on a passing of accounts or direct
a trial of the issues.
Additionally Rule 75.06 states that any person who has a financial interest
in an estate to apply for directions concerning any matter respecting the
estate.
There is no mandatory obligation to pass accounts and estate trustees, attorneys
or guardians, will either voluntarily pass their accounts for any number
of reasons, and/or be compelled to do so by those with a legal interest
to request same.
The court will normally determine only the matters raised on the objection,
unless there are further issues raised at the hearing for directions, wherein
such matters can be included in the Order Giving Directions.
The mandatory mediation rules apply as at Rule 75.1 to passing of accounts
matters.
Rule 75.1 also gives the court the jurisdiction and power to order that
no mediation be conducted or that mediation be exempted. The Estates Act,
Section 10, governs appeals from passing of accounts, which states that
any appeal for a judgment amount exceeding $200.00 is to the Divisional
Court.
As to executor’s compensation, there is an excellent article written
by Jordan Atin, “Executor’s Compensation”.
In terms of timing, there is no particular timing mandated by statute, case
law, or otherwise, concerning the passing of accounts procedure in Ontario.
There has been a great deal of case law in 2007, concerning passing of accounts,
primarily addressing compensation, and the calculation thereof.
Of particular interest is the judgment on passing of accounts of October
2, 2007, K.F. Ross J, in the matter of Strickland v. Thames Valley District
School Board.
This case concerns the accounting by an attorney prior to death, and an
executor accounting. The deceased had capacity up until the date of death,
and consideration as to the entitlement to a passing of the attorney accounts
was given, and a review of Roger Estate v. Leung [2001] O.J. No. 2171, Haley
J. As to the accounts of the executor, the principles established in Laing
Estate, Re Flaska, Re Jeffrey Estate, Toronto General Trust v. Central Ontario
Railway , considered and taken together, applied in calculating compensation.
This case is also worthy of review, since it considers the executor’s
entitlement to costs, relying on the cases of Meredith v. Plaxton, Geffen
v Goodman Estate.
This paper is intended for the purposes of providing information only and is to be used only for the purposes of guidance. This paper is not intended to be relied upon as the giving of legal advice and does not purport to be exhaustive
Kimberly A. Whaley, Whaley Estate Litigation
The Estates Trusts & Pensions Journal- (1999), 19 E.T.P.J. 1.
Strickland v Thames Valley District School Board, 2007 WL 2884417 (Ont.
S.C.J.) 2007 CarswellOnt 6248
Toronto General Trusts and Central Ontario R.W. Co. (1905), 6 O.W.R. 350
(H.C.) at p. 354.; Laing Estate (1998) 41 O.R. (3d) 571 (C.A.); Flaska Estate,
Re (October 20, 1998) Doc. CA C29542 (Ont. C.A.); Jeffery Estate (1990),
39 E.T.R. 173 (Ont. Surr. Ct);
Meredith v Plaxton 62 O.R. (3d) 427 [2002] O.J. No. 4472; Geffen v. Goodman
1991 CarswellAlta 91, 80 Alta L.R. (2d) 293, [1991] 5 W.W.R. 389, 127 N.R.
241, 42 E.T.R. 97
* Please visit the 'Publications' Section of our website for further information and resources.